Must We Know What We Mean?

Abstract: In his 1987 article “Indeterminacy, Empiricism and the First Person”, John Searle argues that we actually know what we mean; therefore, W. V. O. Quine’s thesis of the indeterminacy of translation must be wrong. In this paper, I will try to identify the mistakes in Searle’s criticism of Quine’s story. I will argue that Quine’s indeterminacy thesis can be construed as containing two theses- that is, the immanent indeterminacy and the transcendent indeterminacy. With these two indeterminacies in mind, Quine’s indeterminacy thesis will still remain tenable even if we actually know what we mean.

Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Extent
Online-Ressource
Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Must We Know What We Mean? ; volume:1 ; number:19 ; year:2005 ; pages:21-33 ; extent:13
Kriterion ; 1, Heft 19 (2005), 21-33 (gesamt 13)

Creator
Cheng, Kuang-Ming

DOI
10.1515/krt-2005-011906
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022090314500581442147
Rights
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
15.08.2025, 7:29 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Associated

  • Cheng, Kuang-Ming

Other Objects (12)