It depends…different direct democratic instruments and equality in Europe from 1990 to 2015
Abstract: Despite the popularity of direct democracy in recent decades, research on the actual output effects of popular decision-making is rare. This is especially true with regard to equality, where there are at least three major research gaps: 1) a lack of cross-national analyses; 2) insufficient investigation of the differential effects of different direct democratic instruments on equality; and 3) a failure to distinguish between different aspects of equality, i.e., socioeconomic, legal and political equality. This article takes a first step to tackle these shortcomings by looking at all national referenda in European democracies between 1990 and 2015, differentiating between mandatory, bottom-up and top-down referenda. We find that a large majority of successful direct democratic bills -regardless of which instrument is employed- are not related to equality issues. Of the remaining ones, there are generally more successful pro-equality bills than contra-equality ones, but the differenc
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Veröffentlichungsversion
begutachtet (peer reviewed)
In: Politics and Governance ; 7 (2019) 2 ; 365-379
- Klassifikation
-
Politik
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Mannheim
- (wer)
-
SSOAR, GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften e.V.
- (wann)
-
2019
- Urheber
- DOI
-
10.17645/pag.v7i2.1881
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022062717093371721421
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:26 MESZ
Datenpartner
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Geissel, Brigitte
- Krämling, Anna
- Paulus, Lars
- SSOAR, GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften e.V.
Entstanden
- 2019