Friendly Takeover, or: the Power of the ‘First Word’ : The German Constitutional Court Embraces the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Standard of Domestic Judicial Review
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
In: European Constitutional Law Review ; 16 (2020), 2. - S. 187-212. - Cambridge University Press. - ISSN 1574-0196. - eISSN 1744-5515
- Classification
-
Recht
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (where)
-
Konstanz
- (who)
-
KOPS Universität Konstanz
- (when)
-
2020
- Creator
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-ux6jfnhxlo4n6
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
25.03.2025, 1:50 PM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Thym, Daniel
- KOPS Universität Konstanz
Time of origin
- 2020
Other Objects (12)
Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice
Beyond parliament's reach? : the role of the European Parliament in the CFSP
Blending National Autonomy into the EU Charter : A Reply to Leonard F. M. Besselink
The Irony of Brexit for Immigration Control
The ‘Justice’ Potential of EU Constitutional Law
“United in Diversity” : the integration of enhanced cooperation into the European constitutional order
The Solitude of European Law Made in Germany
Reforming the Common European Asylum System : Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum
Who Controls the Digital Frankenstein?
A Spring in the Desert
Why the EU-Turkey Deal is Legal and a Step in the Right Direction
The Case Against an Autonomous ‘EU Rump Citizenship’
Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice
Beyond parliament's reach? : the role of the European Parliament in the CFSP
Blending National Autonomy into the EU Charter : A Reply to Leonard F. M. Besselink
The Irony of Brexit for Immigration Control
The ‘Justice’ Potential of EU Constitutional Law
“United in Diversity” : the integration of enhanced cooperation into the European constitutional order
The Solitude of European Law Made in Germany
Reforming the Common European Asylum System : Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum
Who Controls the Digital Frankenstein?
A Spring in the Desert
Why the EU-Turkey Deal is Legal and a Step in the Right Direction
The Case Against an Autonomous ‘EU Rump Citizenship’
Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice
Beyond parliament's reach? : the role of the European Parliament in the CFSP
Blending National Autonomy into the EU Charter : A Reply to Leonard F. M. Besselink
The Irony of Brexit for Immigration Control
The ‘Justice’ Potential of EU Constitutional Law
“United in Diversity” : the integration of enhanced cooperation into the European constitutional order
The Solitude of European Law Made in Germany
Reforming the Common European Asylum System : Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum
Who Controls the Digital Frankenstein?
A Spring in the Desert
Why the EU-Turkey Deal is Legal and a Step in the Right Direction