Friendly Takeover, or: the Power of the ‘First Word’ : The German Constitutional Court Embraces the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Standard of Domestic Judicial Review
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
In: European Constitutional Law Review ; 16 (2020), 2. - S. 187-212. - Cambridge University Press. - ISSN 1574-0196. - eISSN 1744-5515
- Klassifikation
-
Recht
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Konstanz
- (wer)
-
KOPS Universität Konstanz
- (wann)
-
2020
- Urheber
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-ux6jfnhxlo4n6
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
25.03.2025, 13:50 MEZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Thym, Daniel
- KOPS Universität Konstanz
Entstanden
- 2020
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice
Beyond parliament's reach? : the role of the European Parliament in the CFSP
Blending National Autonomy into the EU Charter : A Reply to Leonard F. M. Besselink
The Irony of Brexit for Immigration Control
The ‘Justice’ Potential of EU Constitutional Law
“United in Diversity” : the integration of enhanced cooperation into the European constitutional order
The Solitude of European Law Made in Germany
Reforming the Common European Asylum System : Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum
Who Controls the Digital Frankenstein?
A Spring in the Desert
Why the EU-Turkey Deal is Legal and a Step in the Right Direction
The Case Against an Autonomous ‘EU Rump Citizenship’
Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice
Beyond parliament's reach? : the role of the European Parliament in the CFSP
Blending National Autonomy into the EU Charter : A Reply to Leonard F. M. Besselink
The Irony of Brexit for Immigration Control
The ‘Justice’ Potential of EU Constitutional Law
“United in Diversity” : the integration of enhanced cooperation into the European constitutional order
The Solitude of European Law Made in Germany
Reforming the Common European Asylum System : Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum
Who Controls the Digital Frankenstein?
A Spring in the Desert
Why the EU-Turkey Deal is Legal and a Step in the Right Direction
The Case Against an Autonomous ‘EU Rump Citizenship’
Separation versus Fusion - or : How to Accommodate National Autonomy and the Charter? ; Diverging Visions of the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice
Beyond parliament's reach? : the role of the European Parliament in the CFSP
Blending National Autonomy into the EU Charter : A Reply to Leonard F. M. Besselink
The Irony of Brexit for Immigration Control
The ‘Justice’ Potential of EU Constitutional Law
“United in Diversity” : the integration of enhanced cooperation into the European constitutional order
The Solitude of European Law Made in Germany
Reforming the Common European Asylum System : Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum
Who Controls the Digital Frankenstein?
A Spring in the Desert
Why the EU-Turkey Deal is Legal and a Step in the Right Direction