Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel
Can Inequality Be Reformed?
Three limitations in standard method measurement of income redistribution are considered: (1) redistribution is seen as a matter of global rather than marginal effects, (2) structural effects on the distribution of factor income are not accounted for, & (3) cross-section & life-cycle effects are conflated. Evidence from recent research is introduced, & it is argued that standard method results are reasonably robust in spite of limitations in the methodology. A positive association in advanced industrial companies between tax/transfer policy & income inequality is contended to be a firmly established conclusion, which suggests that if government wants to modify income inequality, it has a tool for so doing in tax & transfer policy, & if it should want to reshape transfers or taxes for other reasons, it must expect distributional consequences.
- Umfang
-
Seite(n): 19-28
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet
- Erschienen in
-
Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 4(1)
- Thema
-
Wirtschaft
Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
Wirtschaftspolitik
Einkommenspolitik, Lohnpolitik, Tarifpolitik, Vermögenspolitik
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Ringen, Stein
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wann)
-
1996
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54026
- Rechteinformation
-
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
21.06.2024, 16:27 MESZ
Datenpartner
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel
Beteiligte
- Ringen, Stein
Entstanden
- 1996