Arbeitspapier

Exit vs. Voice

We study the relative effectiveness of exit (divestment and boycott) and voice (engagement) strategies in promoting socially desirable outcomes in companies that generate externalities. We show that if the majority of investors are socially responsible, voice achieves the socially desirable outcome, while exit does not. If the majority of investors are purely selfish, exit is a more effective strategy, but neither strategy generally achieves the first best. We also show that individual incentives to join an exit strategy are not aligned with social incentives, and hence exit can lead to a worse outcome than if all individuals are purely selfish.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: New Working Paper Series ; No. 302

Classification
Wirtschaft
Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
Firm Behavior: Theory
Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
Externalities
Altruism; Philanthropy; Intergenerational Transfers
Public Goods
Business Objectives of the Firm
Subject
Exit
Voice
Social Responsibility
Divestment
Boycott
Engagement

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Broccardo, Eleonora
Hart, Oliver D.
Zingales, Luigi
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State
(where)
Chicago, IL
(when)
2021

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Broccardo, Eleonora
  • Hart, Oliver D.
  • Zingales, Luigi
  • University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State

Time of origin

  • 2021

Other Objects (12)