Arbeitspapier

Exit vs. Voice

We study the relative effectiveness of exit (divestment and boycott) and voice (engagement) strategies in promoting socially desirable outcomes in companies that generate externalities. We show that if the majority of investors are socially responsible, voice achieves the socially desirable outcome, while exit does not. If the majority of investors are purely selfish, exit is a more effective strategy, but neither strategy generally achieves the first best. We also show that individual incentives to join an exit strategy are not aligned with social incentives, and hence exit can lead to a worse outcome than if all individuals are purely selfish.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: New Working Paper Series ; No. 302

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
Firm Behavior: Theory
Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
Externalities
Altruism; Philanthropy; Intergenerational Transfers
Public Goods
Business Objectives of the Firm
Thema
Exit
Voice
Social Responsibility
Divestment
Boycott
Engagement

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Broccardo, Eleonora
Hart, Oliver D.
Zingales, Luigi
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State
(wo)
Chicago, IL
(wann)
2021

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:43 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Broccardo, Eleonora
  • Hart, Oliver D.
  • Zingales, Luigi
  • University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State

Entstanden

  • 2021

Ähnliche Objekte (12)