Arbeitspapier

The Rise and Fall of Bioenergy

If bioenergy has a less negative impact on the climate than fossil energy, it may be optimal to have a significant increase in the use of bioenergy over time. Due to the difference in the way the climate is affected by the two types of energy, the future time path of the use of bioenergy may be non-monotonic: It may be optimal to first have an increase in its use, and later a reduction. Optimal taxes and subsidies are derived both for the first-best case and for the case of a constraint on the size of the fossil tax.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: CESifo Working Paper ; No. 6971

Classification
Wirtschaft
Alternative Energy Sources
Energy: Government Policy
Climate; Natural Disasters and Their Management; Global Warming
Environmental Economics: Government Policy
Subject
bioenergy
renewable energy
climate policy
carbon tax
second best
subsidies

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Hoel, Michael Olaf
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
(where)
Munich
(when)
2018

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:44 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Hoel, Michael Olaf
  • Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)

Time of origin

  • 2018

Other Objects (12)