Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel
Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews
This study analyses determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews. Based on theoretical assumptions about opportunity structure, social control, social support, and companionship, we investigated partner presence using data from the first wave of the German Family Panel (pairfam). Descriptive results revealed that an intimate partner was present in every seventh interview. Multivariate results using separate logistic regression models for the presence of the female (n = 3,272) and the male partner (n = 2,348) revealed that the opportunity structure, such as the couple’s living arrangements or their employment status, had the greatest influence on the presence of both female and male partners. Gender differences existed for social control, social support and companionship. The results suggest that partner presence could most easily be prevented by taking into account the opportunity structure.
- ISSN
-
2296-4754
- Umfang
-
Seite(n): 17
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
- Erschienen in
-
Survey Methods: Insights from the Field
- Thema
-
Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften
soziale Kontrolle
soziale Unterstützung
geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren
Interview
Determinanten
Messung
Antwortverhalten
Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Kommunikation
Struktur
Selbsteinschätzung
Selbstwertgefühl
Partnerschaft
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Preetz, Richard
Langeheine, Malte
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Deutschland
- (wann)
-
2017
- DOI
- Rechteinformation
-
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
21.06.2024, 16:27 MESZ
Datenpartner
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Zeitschriftenartikel
Beteiligte
- Preetz, Richard
- Langeheine, Malte
Entstanden
- 2017
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)
Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction
Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)
Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior
On the duration of face-to-face contacts
Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior
Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?
Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)