Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel

Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews

This study analyses determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews. Based on theoretical assumptions about opportunity structure, social control, social support, and companionship, we investigated partner presence using data from the first wave of the German Family Panel (pairfam). Descriptive results revealed that an intimate partner was present in every seventh interview. Multivariate results using separate logistic regression models for the presence of the female (n = 3,272) and the male partner (n = 2,348) revealed that the opportunity structure, such as the couple’s living arrangements or their employment status, had the greatest influence on the presence of both female and male partners. Gender differences existed for social control, social support and companionship. The results suggest that partner presence could most easily be prevented by taking into account the opportunity structure.

Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews | Urheber*in: Preetz, Richard; Langeheine, Malte

Attribution 4.0 International

ISSN: 2296-4754

Extent: Seite(n): 17

Language: Englisch

Notes: Status: Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)

Bibliographic citation: Survey Methods: Insights from the Field

Subject: Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften
soziale Kontrolle
soziale Unterstützung
geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren
Interview
Determinanten
Messung
Antwortverhalten
Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Kommunikation
Struktur
Selbsteinschätzung
Selbstwertgefühl
Partnerschaft

Event: Geistige Schöpfung

(who): Preetz, Richard
Langeheine, Malte

Event: Veröffentlichung

(where): Deutschland

(when): 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2017-00007

Rights: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln

Last update: 21.06.2024, 4:27 PM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. Bibliothek Köln. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Show original at data provider

Object type

Zeitschriftenartikel

Associated

Preetz, Richard
Langeheine, Malte

Time of origin

2017

Other Objects (12)

Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews

Arbeitspapier | Working paper

Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)

Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing

Arbeitspapier

Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior

Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel

Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?

Arbeitspapier

Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior

On the duration of face-to-face contacts

Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior

Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?

Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)

Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction

Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews

Arbeitspapier | Working paper

Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)

Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing

Arbeitspapier

Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior

Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel

Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?

Arbeitspapier

Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior

On the duration of face-to-face contacts

Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior

Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?

Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)

Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction

Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews

Arbeitspapier | Working paper

Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)

Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing

Arbeitspapier

Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior

Journal article | Zeitschriftenartikel

Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?

Arbeitspapier

Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior

On the duration of face-to-face contacts

Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior

Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?

Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)

Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction

Cultural heritage institutions wishing to register will find more information here.

Fields marked * need to be filled in.

Username*

Please enter your username

Email*

Please enter your email address

Please do not fill this field

First name

Last name

Password*

Please enter your password

Confirm password*

Please enter the same password

I have read the terms of use and the privacy policy for the collection of personal data and accept them. *

This field is required.

I would like to subscribe to the newsletter of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek. See newsletter subscription info.

Account created

Your "My DDB" account has been successfully created. Before you can log in to your account, you must click the confirmation link in the message we just sent to the email address you provided.

Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews

Download

Object Details

References and Relationships

Classification and Topics

Contributors, Places and Time

Further information

Data provider

Object type

Associated

Time of origin

Other Objects (12)

Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews

Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)

Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)

Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing

Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior

Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?

Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior

On the duration of face-to-face contacts

Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior

Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?

Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)

Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction

Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews

Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)

Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)

Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing

Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior

Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?

Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior

On the duration of face-to-face contacts

Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior

Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?

Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)

Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction

Why were there three? Determinants of the presence of an intimate partner during face-to-face interviews

Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)

Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 2.0)

Face-to-face : Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing

Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior

Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?

Gender Differences in Face-to-Face Deceptive Behavior

On the duration of face-to-face contacts

Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior

Befragungsmethoden reviewed: face-to-face, telefonisch oder postalisch?

Documentation of Face-to-Face Surveys (Version 1.0)

Understanding technology use in face-to-face interaction

Related objects

Reset password