Arbeitspapier

Jobseekers' beliefs about comparative advantage and (mis)directed search

Worker sorting into tasks and occupations has long been recognized as an important feature of labor markets. But this sorting may be inefficient if jobseekers have inaccurate beliefs about their skills and therefore apply to jobs that do not match their skills. To test this idea, we measure young South African jobseekers' communication and numeracy skills and their beliefs about their skill levels. Many jobseekers believe they are better at the skill in which they score lower, relative to other jobseekers. These beliefs predict the skill requirements of jobs where they apply. In two field experiments, giving jobseekers their skill assessment results shifts their beliefs toward their assessment results. It also redirects their search toward jobs that value the skill in which they score relatively higher - using measures from administrative, incentivized task, and survey data - but does not increase total search effort. It also raises earnings and job quality, consistent with inefficient sorting due to limited information.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: Upjohn Institute Working Paper ; No. 23-388

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Field Experiments
Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
Thema
jobseekers
worker matching
skills
beliefs
search effort
field experiments
South Africa

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Kiss, Andrea
Garlick, Robert
Orkin, Kate
Hensel, Lukas
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research
(wo)
Kalamazoo, MI
(wann)
2023

DOI
doi:10.17848/wp23-388
Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:43 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Kiss, Andrea
  • Garlick, Robert
  • Orkin, Kate
  • Hensel, Lukas
  • W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research

Entstanden

  • 2023

Ähnliche Objekte (12)