Arbeitspapier

Discretionary sanctions and rewards in the repeated inspection game

We experimentally investigate a repeated "inspection game" where, in the stage game, an employee can either work or shirk and an employer simultaneously chooses to inspect or not inspect. Combined payoffs are maximized when the employee works and the employer does not inspect. However, the unique equilibrium of the stage game is in mixed strategies with positive probabilities of shirking/inspecting. We examine the effects of allowing the employer to sanction or reward the employee after she has inspected the employee. We find that rewards or sanctions can both discourage shirking, and have similar effects on joint earnings. In games allowing sanctions a reduction in shirking is accomplished with a lower inspection rate and the efficiency gains accrue to employers. In games allowing rewards employers actively reward employees for working and the efficiency gains are shared more equitably. A treatment where employers can combine sanctions and rewards leads to efficiencies similar to the single-instrument treatments, and outcomes more closely resemble those of the reward treatment in that the efficiency gains are shared.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: CeDEx Discussion Paper Series ; No. 2012-10

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Game Theory and Bargaining Theory: General
Noncooperative Games
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Thema
Inspection Game
Costly Monitoring
Discretionary Incentives
Rewards
Punishment
Experiment

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Nosenzo, Daniele
Offerman, Theo
Sefton, Martin
van der Veen, Ailko
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
The University of Nottingham, Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx)
(wo)
Nottingham
(wann)
2012

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:45 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Nosenzo, Daniele
  • Offerman, Theo
  • Sefton, Martin
  • van der Veen, Ailko
  • The University of Nottingham, Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx)

Entstanden

  • 2012

Ähnliche Objekte (12)