Experts prioritize osteoarthritis non-surgical interventions from Cochrane systematic reviews for translation into “Evidence4Equity” summaries
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1475-9276
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Experts prioritize osteoarthritis non-surgical interventions from Cochrane systematic reviews for translation into “Evidence4Equity” summaries ; volume:20 ; number:1 ; day:10 ; month:6 ; year:2021 ; pages:1-17 ; date:12.2021
International journal for equity in health ; 20, Heft 1 (10.6.2021), 1-17, 12.2021
- Classification
-
Soziale Probleme, Sozialdienste, Versicherungen
- Creator
-
Houlding-Braunberger, Elizabeth
Petkovic, Jennifer
Lebel, Nicholas
Tugwell, Peter
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12939-021-01477-4
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2021100221131304957126
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:35 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Houlding-Braunberger, Elizabeth
- Petkovic, Jennifer
- Lebel, Nicholas
- Tugwell, Peter
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Comparison of blogshots with plain language summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews: a qualitative study and randomized trial
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
Validität von systematischen Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Die Bedeutung der Cochrane Reviews für die Neuropädiatrie
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a Cochrane review protocol
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Comparison of blogshots with plain language summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews: a qualitative study and randomized trial
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
Validität von systematischen Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Die Bedeutung der Cochrane Reviews für die Neuropädiatrie
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a Cochrane review protocol
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Comparison of blogshots with plain language summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews: a qualitative study and randomized trial
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
Validität von systematischen Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Die Bedeutung der Cochrane Reviews für die Neuropädiatrie