Experts prioritize osteoarthritis non-surgical interventions from Cochrane systematic reviews for translation into “Evidence4Equity” summaries
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1475-9276
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Experts prioritize osteoarthritis non-surgical interventions from Cochrane systematic reviews for translation into “Evidence4Equity” summaries ; volume:20 ; number:1 ; day:10 ; month:6 ; year:2021 ; pages:1-17 ; date:12.2021
International journal for equity in health ; 20, Heft 1 (10.6.2021), 1-17, 12.2021
- Klassifikation
-
Soziale Probleme, Sozialdienste, Versicherungen
- Urheber
-
Houlding-Braunberger, Elizabeth
Petkovic, Jennifer
Lebel, Nicholas
Tugwell, Peter
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12939-021-01477-4
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2021100221131304957126
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:35 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Houlding-Braunberger, Elizabeth
- Petkovic, Jennifer
- Lebel, Nicholas
- Tugwell, Peter
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study
Comparison of blogshots with plain language summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews: a qualitative study and randomized trial
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
Validität von systematischen Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Die Bedeutung der Cochrane Reviews für die Neuropädiatrie
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a Cochrane review protocol
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study
Comparison of blogshots with plain language summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews: a qualitative study and randomized trial
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
Validität von systematischen Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Die Bedeutung der Cochrane Reviews für die Neuropädiatrie
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a Cochrane review protocol
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study
Comparison of blogshots with plain language summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews: a qualitative study and randomized trial
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
Validität von systematischen Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Die Bedeutung der Cochrane Reviews für die Neuropädiatrie