Comparative safety of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1741-7015
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Comparative safety of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis ; volume:13 ; number:1 ; day:18 ; month:6 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-13 ; date:12.2015
BMC medicine ; 13, Heft 1 (18.6.2015), 1-13, 12.2015
- Urheber
-
Tricco, Andrea C.
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Soobiah, Charlene
Blondal, Erik
Veroniki, Areti A.
Khan, Paul A.
Vafaei, Afshin
Ivory, John
Strifler, Lisa
Ashoor, Huda
MacDonald, Heather
Reynen, Emily
Robson, Reid
Ho, Joanne
Ng, Carmen
Antony, Jesmin
Mrklas, Kelly
Hutton, Brian
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.
Moher, David
Straus, Sharon E.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12916-015-0379-3
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201611046584
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
- 14.08.2025, 10:55 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Tricco, Andrea C.
- Soobiah, Charlene
- Blondal, Erik
- Veroniki, Areti A.
- Khan, Paul A.
- Vafaei, Afshin
- Ivory, John
- Strifler, Lisa
- Ashoor, Huda
- MacDonald, Heather
- Reynen, Emily
- Robson, Reid
- Ho, Joanne
- Ng, Carmen
- Antony, Jesmin
- Mrklas, Kelly
- Hutton, Brian
- Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.
- Moher, David
- Straus, Sharon E.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Safety of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery and chemotherapy: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for post-surgery or chemotherapy patients taking serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for patients receiving chemotherapy and serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: a systematic review
Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Comparative efficacy of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
A review of interventions triggered by hepatitis A infected food-handlers in Canada
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Safety of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery and chemotherapy: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for post-surgery or chemotherapy patients taking serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for patients receiving chemotherapy and serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: a systematic review
Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Comparative efficacy of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
A review of interventions triggered by hepatitis A infected food-handlers in Canada
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Safety of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery and chemotherapy: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for post-surgery or chemotherapy patients taking serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Interventions to decrease the risk of adverse cardiac events for patients receiving chemotherapy and serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists: a systematic review
Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review
Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers
Comparative efficacy of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review