Arbeitspapier

Minimum wages and racial discrimination in hiring: Evidence from a field experiment

When minimum wages increase, employers may respond to the regulatory burdens by substituting away from disadvantaged workers. We test this hypothesis using a correspondence study with 35,000 applications around ex-ante uncertain minimum wage increases in three U.S. states. Before the increases, applicants with distinctively Black names were 19 percent less likely to receive a callback than equivalent applicants with distinctively white names. Announcements of minimum wage hikes substantially reduce callbacks for all applicants but shrink the racial callback gap by 80 percent. Racial inequality decreases because firms disproportionately reduce callbacks to lower-quality white applicants who benefited from discrimination under lower minimum wages.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Upjohn Institute Working Paper ; No. 23-389

Classification
Wirtschaft
Labor Demand
Field Experiments
Labor Discrimination
Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
Subject
minimum wage
correspondence study
racial discrimination

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Brandon, Alec
Holz, Justin E.
Simon, Andrew
Uchida, Haruka
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research
(where)
Kalamazoo, MI
(when)
2023

DOI
doi:10.17848/wp23-389
Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:44 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Brandon, Alec
  • Holz, Justin E.
  • Simon, Andrew
  • Uchida, Haruka
  • W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research

Time of origin

  • 2023

Other Objects (12)