Arbeitspapier

Mandatory versus discretionary spending: The status quo effect

Do mandatory spending programs such as Medicare improve efficiency? We analyze a model with two parties allocating a fixed budget to a public good and private transfers each period over an infinite horizon. We compare two institutions that differ in whether public good spending is discretionary or mandatory. We model mandatory spending as an endogenous status quo since it is enacted by law and remains in effect until changed. Mandatory programs result in higher public good spending; furthermore, they ex ante Pareto dominate discretionary programs when parties are patient, persistence of power is low, and polarization is low.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: Working Paper ; No. 603

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games; Repeated Games
Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
Thema
budget negotiations
mandatory programs
dynamic bargaining
endogenous status quo
public goods
Gesundheitsversorgung
Öffentliche Güter
Allokationseffizienz
Verhandlungstheorie

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Bowen, T. Renee
Chen, Ying
Eraslan, Hülya
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Economics
(wo)
Baltimore, MD
(wann)
2012

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:42 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Bowen, T. Renee
  • Chen, Ying
  • Eraslan, Hülya
  • The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Economics

Entstanden

  • 2012

Ähnliche Objekte (12)