- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1741-7015
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials ; volume:13 ; number:1 ; day:2 ; month:11 ; year:2015 ; pages:1-7 ; date:12.2015
BMC medicine ; 13, Heft 1 (2.11.2015), 1-7, 12.2015
- Creator
-
Del Mar, Chris
- Contributor
-
Hoffmann, Tammy C.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12916-015-0471-8
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-201611046791
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:54 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Del Mar, Chris
- Hoffmann, Tammy C.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?
Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials
High-Performing Peers and Female STEM Choices in School
Planning a method for covariate adjustment in individually randomised trials: a practical guide
Performing meta-analysis with incomplete statistical information in clinical trials
Guide for investigator initiated trials
Removing unnecessary obstacles to randomised trials
Covariance modelling for randomised controlled trials
Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials
Randomised controlled trials of complex interventions
Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials
Much ado about something: a response to “COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?”
COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?
Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials
High-Performing Peers and Female STEM Choices in School
Planning a method for covariate adjustment in individually randomised trials: a practical guide
Performing meta-analysis with incomplete statistical information in clinical trials
Guide for investigator initiated trials
Removing unnecessary obstacles to randomised trials
Covariance modelling for randomised controlled trials
Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials
Randomised controlled trials of complex interventions
Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials
Much ado about something: a response to “COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?”
COVID-19: underpowered randomised trials, or no randomised trials?
Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials
High-Performing Peers and Female STEM Choices in School
Planning a method for covariate adjustment in individually randomised trials: a practical guide
Performing meta-analysis with incomplete statistical information in clinical trials
Guide for investigator initiated trials
Removing unnecessary obstacles to randomised trials
Covariance modelling for randomised controlled trials
Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials
Randomised controlled trials of complex interventions
Influence of peer review on the reporting of primary outcome(s) and statistical analyses of randomised trials