Arbeitspapier
Non-reciprocal preference erosion arising from MFN liberalitzation in agriculture: What are the risks?
This paper estimates the risk of preference erosion for non-reciprocal preference recipients in the agricultural sector as a consequence of MFN tariff cuts. It is based on a simulation of a single tariff-cutting scenario. The measure of preference erosion risk is the difference in preference margins enjoyed by individual suppliers to the QUAD (Canada, EU, Japan, United States) markets before and after a MFN tariff reduction, multiplied by the associated trade flow. The paper does not attempt to determine how losses in preference margins translate into trade outcomes, but it does highlight which products and which non-reciprocal preference beneficiaries are the most vulnerable to erosion effects in the major developed country markets. Overall, the paper finds that the risk of preference erosion is small, but some countries are strongly affected in particular product lines (notably sugar and bananas).
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: WTO Staff Working Paper ; No. ERSD-2006-02
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
- Thema
-
Außenhandelsliberalisierung
Agraraußenhandel
Außenhandelspräferenz
Meistbegünstigung
Kanada
EU-Staaten
Japan
USA
Entwicklungsländer
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Low, Patrick
Piermartini, Roberta
Richtering, Jurgen
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
World Trade Organization (WTO)
- (wo)
-
Geneva
- (wann)
-
2006
- DOI
-
doi:10.30875/54e62fd6-en
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
10.03.2025, 11:45 MEZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Low, Patrick
- Piermartini, Roberta
- Richtering, Jurgen
- World Trade Organization (WTO)
Entstanden
- 2006
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Non-reciprocal Region-building
Multilateral solutions to the erosion of non-reciprocal preferences in NAMA
Non-reciprocal Interferometers for Matter Waves
A consensus building model in group decision making with non-reciprocal fuzzy preference relations
Are EU non-reciprocal trade preferences passé?
Non-reciprocal and non-Newtonian mechanical metamaterials
Non-reciprocal SAW devices for RF applications
Do nonreciprocal preference regimes increase exports?
Loss-compensated non-reciprocal scattering based on synchronization
Reciprocal and Non‐reciprocal Chiroptical Features in Thin Films of Organic Dyes
Evaluative Influences of CS-US Pairings Are Non-Reciprocal
Self‐Organized Patterns in Non‐Reciprocal Active Droplet Systems
Non-reciprocal Region-building
Multilateral solutions to the erosion of non-reciprocal preferences in NAMA
Non-reciprocal Interferometers for Matter Waves
A consensus building model in group decision making with non-reciprocal fuzzy preference relations
Are EU non-reciprocal trade preferences passé?
Non-reciprocal and non-Newtonian mechanical metamaterials
Non-reciprocal SAW devices for RF applications
Do nonreciprocal preference regimes increase exports?
Loss-compensated non-reciprocal scattering based on synchronization
Reciprocal and Non‐reciprocal Chiroptical Features in Thin Films of Organic Dyes
Evaluative Influences of CS-US Pairings Are Non-Reciprocal
Self‐Organized Patterns in Non‐Reciprocal Active Droplet Systems
Non-reciprocal Region-building
Multilateral solutions to the erosion of non-reciprocal preferences in NAMA
Non-reciprocal Interferometers for Matter Waves
A consensus building model in group decision making with non-reciprocal fuzzy preference relations
Are EU non-reciprocal trade preferences passé?
Non-reciprocal and non-Newtonian mechanical metamaterials
Non-reciprocal SAW devices for RF applications
Do nonreciprocal preference regimes increase exports?
Loss-compensated non-reciprocal scattering based on synchronization
Reciprocal and Non‐reciprocal Chiroptical Features in Thin Films of Organic Dyes
Evaluative Influences of CS-US Pairings Are Non-Reciprocal