Analyzing Promising Researchers Using Network Centralities of Co-authorship Networks from Academic Literature
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1882-7055
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Analyzing Promising Researchers Using Network Centralities of Co-authorship Networks from Academic Literature ; day:19 ; month:9 ; year:2020 ; pages:1-17
New generation computing ; (19.9.2020), 1-17
- Urheber
-
Fujita, Masanori
Inoue, Hiroto
Terano, Takao
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1007/s00354-020-00102-2
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020110816060453848224
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:20 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Fujita, Masanori
- Inoue, Hiroto
- Terano, Takao
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers
Academic co-authorship is a risky game
Impact of academic authorship characteristics on article citations
Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study
Insights from the co-authorship network of the Italian academic statisticians
Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam
The rules and realities of authorship in biomedical journals: A cautionary tale for aspiring researchers
Analyzing Mathematical Content to Detect Academic Plagiarism
A Blueprint for Involvement: Reflections of lived experience co-researchers and academic researchers on working collaboratively
Opinions on registering trial details: a survey of academic researchers
How academic researchers select collaborative research projects: a choice experiment
Knowledge transfer to industry: how academic researchers learn to become boundary spanners during academic engagement
Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers
Academic co-authorship is a risky game
Impact of academic authorship characteristics on article citations
Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study
Insights from the co-authorship network of the Italian academic statisticians
Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam
The rules and realities of authorship in biomedical journals: A cautionary tale for aspiring researchers
Analyzing Mathematical Content to Detect Academic Plagiarism
A Blueprint for Involvement: Reflections of lived experience co-researchers and academic researchers on working collaboratively
Opinions on registering trial details: a survey of academic researchers
How academic researchers select collaborative research projects: a choice experiment
Knowledge transfer to industry: how academic researchers learn to become boundary spanners during academic engagement
Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers
Academic co-authorship is a risky game
Impact of academic authorship characteristics on article citations
Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study
Insights from the co-authorship network of the Italian academic statisticians
Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam
The rules and realities of authorship in biomedical journals: A cautionary tale for aspiring researchers
Analyzing Mathematical Content to Detect Academic Plagiarism
A Blueprint for Involvement: Reflections of lived experience co-researchers and academic researchers on working collaboratively
Opinions on registering trial details: a survey of academic researchers
How academic researchers select collaborative research projects: a choice experiment