Analyzing Promising Researchers Using Network Centralities of Co-authorship Networks from Academic Literature
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1882-7055
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Analyzing Promising Researchers Using Network Centralities of Co-authorship Networks from Academic Literature ; day:19 ; month:9 ; year:2020 ; pages:1-17
New generation computing ; (19.9.2020), 1-17
- Creator
-
Fujita, Masanori
Inoue, Hiroto
Terano, Takao
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1007/s00354-020-00102-2
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020110816060453848224
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:20 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Fujita, Masanori
- Inoue, Hiroto
- Terano, Takao
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers
Academic co-authorship is a risky game
Impact of academic authorship characteristics on article citations
Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study
Insights from the co-authorship network of the Italian academic statisticians
Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam
The rules and realities of authorship in biomedical journals: A cautionary tale for aspiring researchers
Analyzing Mathematical Content to Detect Academic Plagiarism
A Blueprint for Involvement: Reflections of lived experience co-researchers and academic researchers on working collaboratively
Opinions on registering trial details: a survey of academic researchers
How academic researchers select collaborative research projects: a choice experiment
Knowledge transfer to industry: how academic researchers learn to become boundary spanners during academic engagement
Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers
Academic co-authorship is a risky game
Impact of academic authorship characteristics on article citations
Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study
Insights from the co-authorship network of the Italian academic statisticians
Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam
The rules and realities of authorship in biomedical journals: A cautionary tale for aspiring researchers
Analyzing Mathematical Content to Detect Academic Plagiarism
A Blueprint for Involvement: Reflections of lived experience co-researchers and academic researchers on working collaboratively
Opinions on registering trial details: a survey of academic researchers
How academic researchers select collaborative research projects: a choice experiment
Knowledge transfer to industry: how academic researchers learn to become boundary spanners during academic engagement
Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers
Academic co-authorship is a risky game
Impact of academic authorship characteristics on article citations
Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study
Insights from the co-authorship network of the Italian academic statisticians
Researchers’ perceptions of research misbehaviours: a mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam
The rules and realities of authorship in biomedical journals: A cautionary tale for aspiring researchers
Analyzing Mathematical Content to Detect Academic Plagiarism
A Blueprint for Involvement: Reflections of lived experience co-researchers and academic researchers on working collaboratively
Opinions on registering trial details: a survey of academic researchers
How academic researchers select collaborative research projects: a choice experiment