Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2288
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study ; volume:11 ; number:1 ; day:24 ; month:2 ; year:2011 ; pages:1-8 ; date:12.2011
BMC medical research methodology ; 11, Heft 1 (24.2.2011), 1-8, 12.2011
- Creator
-
Schroll, Jeppe B.
- Contributor
-
Moustgaard, Rasmus
Gøtzsche, Peter C.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1471-2288-11-22
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016032131824
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:44 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Schroll, Jeppe B.
- Moustgaard, Rasmus
- Gøtzsche, Peter C.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Validität von systematischen Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Die Bedeutung der Cochrane Reviews für die Neuropädiatrie
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
Defining the clinical pathway in cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Use of inactive Cochrane reviews in academia: A citation analysis
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Validität von systematischen Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Die Bedeutung der Cochrane Reviews für die Neuropädiatrie
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
Defining the clinical pathway in cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Use of inactive Cochrane reviews in academia: A citation analysis
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Validität von systematischen Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Die Bedeutung der Cochrane Reviews für die Neuropädiatrie
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
Defining the clinical pathway in cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews