- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2288
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
online resource.
- Erschienen in
-
Defining the clinical pathway in cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews ; volume:16 ; number:1 ; day:10 ; month:11 ; year:2016 ; pages:1-8 ; date:12.2016
BMC medical research methodology ; 16, Heft 1 (10.11.2016), 1-8, 12.2016
- Urheber
-
Gopalakrishna, G.
- Beteiligte Personen und Organisationen
-
Langendam, Miranda W.
Scholten, Rob J. P. M.
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Leeflang, Mariska M. G.
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s12874-016-0252-x
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016120313435
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
14.08.2025, 10:53 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Gopalakrishna, G.
- Langendam, Miranda W.
- Scholten, Rob J. P. M.
- Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
- Leeflang, Mariska M. G.
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Data sources and methods used to determine pretest probabilities in a cohort of Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Validität von systematischen Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Die Bedeutung der Cochrane Reviews für die Neuropädiatrie
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Data sources and methods used to determine pretest probabilities in a cohort of Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Validität von systematischen Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Die Bedeutung der Cochrane Reviews für die Neuropädiatrie
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
Prioritising Cochrane reviews to be updated with health equity focus
Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Systematische Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Data sources and methods used to determine pretest probabilities in a cohort of Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Validität von systematischen Reviews der Cochrane Collaboration
Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
Die Bedeutung der Cochrane Reviews für die Neuropädiatrie
Assessing and presenting summaries of evidence in Cochrane Reviews
Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial