Arbeitspapier
The (ir)relevance of real wage rigidity in the New Keynesian model with search frictions
We explore the role of real wage dynamics in a New Keynesian business cycle model with search and matching frictions in the labor market. Both job creation and destruction are endogenous. We show that the model generates counterfactual inflation and labor market dynamics. In particular, it fails to generate a Beveridge curve: vacancies and unemployment are positively correlated. Introducing real wage rigidity leads to a negative correlation, and increases the magnitude of labor market flows to more realistic values. However, inflation dynamics are only weakly affected by real wage rigidity. This is because of the presence of labor market frictions, which generate long-run employment relationships. The measure of real marginal cost that is relevant for inflation dynamics via the Phillips curve contains a dynamic component that does not necessarily move with real wages.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Working Paper ; No. 504
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity
Business Fluctuations; Cycles
Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
- Subject
-
Labor Market
Real Wage
Search and Matching
New Keynesian Model
Beveridge Curve
Lohnbildung
Lohnrigidität
Neukeynesianische Makroökonomik
Arbeitsmarkt
Friktionelle Arbeitslosigkeit
Theorie
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Krause, Michael U.
Lubik, Thomas A.
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Economics
- (where)
-
Baltimore, MD
- (when)
-
2003
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:41 AM CET
Data provider
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Arbeitspapier
Associated
- Krause, Michael U.
- Lubik, Thomas A.
- The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Economics
Time of origin
- 2003