Education, Growth and Income Inequality

Arbeitspapier

Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return) have been hard to reconcile with micro evidence on the private return to schooling. We present a simple explanation combining two ideas: imperfect substitution and endogenous skill-biased technological progress and use cross-country panel data on inequality and GDP to test these ideas. A one-year increase in the level of education reduces the private return by 2 percentage points, consistent with Katz-Murphy's (1992) elasticity of substitution. We find no evidence for reversal of this initial effect as in Acemoglu (2002). In the short run, the social return equals the private return.

Object Details

• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Series: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper ; No. 02-001/3

Classification and Topics

• Classification: Wirtschaft ; Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy: General (includes Measurement and Data) ; Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity ; Economic Development: General ; Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
• Subject: education ; inequality ; growth ; Bildungsökonomik ; Wachstumstheorie ; Einkommensverteilung ; Bildungsertrag ; Lohnstruktur ; Humankapital ; Faktorsubstitution ; Schätzung ; Theorie ; Welt

Contributors, Places and Time

• Event: Geistige Schöpfung
• (who): Teulings, Coen N. ; van Rens, Thijs
• Event: Veröffentlichung
• (who): Tinbergen Institute
• (where): Amsterdam and Rotterdam
• (when): 2002

Further information

• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/85816
• Last update: 10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET