Artikel

Are pain and suffering awards (un-)predictable? Evidence from Germany

This paper assesses the widely held belief that damages for pain and suffering are random or arbitrary. In detail, we investigate whether damages for pain and suffering are systematically affected by individual-, injury- and procedural-specific characteristics and how important these factors are relative to each other. To uncover the predictability of these awards, we rely on a sample of German damages for pain and suffering awards including 2.244 verdicts. By estimating a standard regression model we observe that final awards are systematically influenced by the injury's conditions, by the court level the case is brought in and by the engagement of a lawyer. Our findings let us conclude that damages for pain and suffering and the respective assessment process within the German judicial system are largely reasonable and transparent rather than random.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Journal: DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review ; ISSN: 1804-8285 ; Volume: 10 ; Year: 2019 ; Issue: 3 ; Pages: 199-219 ; Warsaw: De Gruyter

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Thema
Tort Law
Damages for Pain and Suffering
Civil Procedure
Predictability

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena
Leiter, Andrea M.
Winner, Hannes
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
De Gruyter
(wo)
Warsaw
(wann)
2019

DOI
doi:10.2478/danb-2019-0011
Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:44 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Artikel

Beteiligte

  • Flatscher-Thöni, Magdalena
  • Leiter, Andrea M.
  • Winner, Hannes
  • De Gruyter

Entstanden

  • 2019

Ähnliche Objekte (12)