Enativismo e conhecimento prático

Abstract: In 'Being and Time' (1927), Heidegger claims the primordial knowledge of Dasein comes from coping with mundane beings. Merleau-Ponty, in turn, argues on 'Phenomenology of Perception' (1945) for knowledge as a bodily activity non translatable in propositional terms. Later, on 'What Computers Can't Do' (1972), Hubert Dreyfus use the work of both to point out the flaws of cognitivism, the dominant paradigm in early days of artificial intelligence. Finally, 'The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience' (1991) by Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson and Eleanor Rosch brings enactivism as an attempt to take from cognitivism and connectionism the hegemony in cognitive sciences. That being said, the paper describes enactivism while showing its phenomenological heritage

Alternative title
Enactivism and practical knowledge
Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Extent
Online-Ressource
Language
Portugiesisch
Notes
Veröffentlichungsversion
begutachtet (peer reviewed)
In: Griot: Revista de Filosofia ; 19 (2019) 3 ; 12-22

Classification
Philosophie

Event
Veröffentlichung
(where)
Mannheim
(who)
SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository
(when)
2019
Creator
Benevides Barbosa Gomes, Rodrigo

DOI
10.31977/grirfi.v19i3.1296
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2021020515492143335385
Rights
Open Access; Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
15.08.2025, 7:27 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Associated

  • Benevides Barbosa Gomes, Rodrigo
  • SSOAR - Social Science Open Access Repository

Time of origin

  • 2019

Other Objects (12)