Means Paternalism and the Problem of Indeterminacy

Abstract: Many contemporary defenders of paternalist interventions favor a version of paternalism focused on how people often choose the wrong means given their own ends. This idea is typically justified by empirical results in psychology and behavioral economics. To the extent that paternalist interventions can then target the promotion of goals that can be said to be our own, such interventions are prima facie less problematic. One version of this argument starts from the idea that it is meaningful to ascribe to us preferences that we would have if were fully rational, informed and in control over our actions. It is argued here, however, that the very body of empirical results that means paternalists typically rely on also undermines this idea as a robust enough notion. A more modest approach to paternalist interventions, on which such policies are understood as enmeshed with welfare-state policies promoting certain primary goods, is then proposed instead.

Object Details

• Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
• Extent: Online-Ressource
• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Means Paternalism and the Problem of Indeterminacy ; volume:10 ; number:1 ; year:2023 ; pages:47-67 ; extent:21 ; Moral philosophy and politics ; 10, Heft 1 (2023), 47-67 (gesamt 21)

Contributors, Places and Time

• Creator: Brännmark, Johan

Further information

• DOI: 10.1515/mopp-2021-0032
• URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023032814155541265817
• Rights: Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
• Last update: 14.08.2025, 10:46 AM CEST