The Cost of Public Funding with Direct and Indirect Taxation - a Revisit

Arbeitspapier

The paper shows that the marginal cost of public funds (MCF) does not depend on whether public revenue is collected by taxation of consumer goods or income from factors supplied by households on the market. Atkinson and Stern (1974) concluded in their seminal paper that “[...] whether the Conventional Rule provides an under- or over-estimate depends on the choice of taxed good [....].” This conclusion has created confusion in the literature on the MCF and has been the basis for recent literature arguing that the standard measure of the MCF has weaknesses and should be replaced by alternative measures (Jacobs, 2018; Håkonsen, 1998). We show that the conclusion of Atkinson and Stern (1974) on this issue is not valid and is based on an error in their analysis.

Object Details

• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Series: CESifo Working Paper ; No. 8907

Classification and Topics

• Classification: Wirtschaft ; Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General ; Publicly Provided Goods: General ; National Government Expenditures and Related Policies: General
• Subject: marginal cost of public funds ; taxation ; Samuelson rule

Contributors, Places and Time

• Event: Geistige Schöpfung
• (who): Holtsmark, Bjart J. ; Holtsmark, Katinka Kristine
• Event: Veröffentlichung
• (who): Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo)
• (where): Munich
• (when): 2021

Further information

• Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/235277
• Last update: 10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET