Arbeitspapier

Is observed other-regarding behavior always genuine?

We investigate to what extent genuine social preferences can explain observed other-regarding behavior. In a social dilemma situation (a dictator game variant), people can choose whether to learn about the consequences of their choice for the receiver. We find that a majority of the people that show other-regarding behavior when the payoffs of the receiver are known chose to ignore them if possible. This behavior is inconsistent with genuine other-regarding preferences. Our model explains other-regarding behavior as avoiding cognitive dissonance: Peo- ple do not behave fairly because they genuinely care for others, but because they like to think of themselves as being fair. The model can explain our data as well as earlier experimental data.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Jena Economic Research Papers ; No. 2007,109

Classification
Wirtschaft
Subject
social preferences
experiments
social dilemma
cognitive dissonance
Gefangenendilemma
Soziale Beziehungen
Präferenztheorie
Kognition
Test

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Matthey, Astrid
Regner, Tobias
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics
(where)
Jena
(when)
2007

Handle
Last update
25.06.2025, 9:45 PM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Matthey, Astrid
  • Regner, Tobias
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics

Time of origin

  • 2007

Other Objects (12)