Structural Biology of RNA and Protein‐RNA Complexes after AlphaFold3

Abstract: Recent breakthroughs in AI‐mediated protein structure prediction have significantly accelerated research and generated valuable hypotheses within the field of structural biology and beyond. Notably, AlphaFold2 has facilitated the determination of larger protein complexes for which only limited experimental data are available. De novo predictions can now be experimentally validated with relative ease compared to the pre‐AlphaFold2 era. In May 2024, AlphaFold3 was launched with high expectations, promising the capability to accurately predict RNA structures and protein‐RNA complexes ‐ features that were absent in AlphaFold2. This review evaluates the extent to which AlphaFold3 fulfills this promise through specific examples. At present, AlphaFold3 falls short in reliably predicting RNA and protein‐RNA complex structures, particularly for non‐canonical interactions where training data remain scarce. As a result, users should exercise caution when using AlphaFold3 predictions as hypotheses generators for RNA and protein‐RNA complex structures. In the interim, integrating AI‐based predictors with data‐driven docking tools is recommended to address these limitations. This approach can help bridge the gap until sufficient training data are available to enable the development of more reliable predictive algorithms.

Angaben zum Objekt

• Standort: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
• Umfang: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: Englisch

Verweise und Beziehungen

• Erschienen in: Structural Biology of RNA and Protein‐RNA Complexes after AlphaFold3 ; day:20 ; month:02 ; year:2025 ; extent:13 ; ChemBioChem ; (20.02.2025) (gesamt 13)

Beteiligte, Orts- und Zeitangaben

• Urheber: Hennig, Janosch

Weitere Informationen

• DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202401047
• URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-2502211309331.484891427216
• Rechteinformation: Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
• Letzte Aktualisierung: 15.08.2025, 07:30 MESZ