Arbeitspapier
Market driven network neutrality and the fallacies of Internet traffic quality regulation
In the U.S. paying for priority arrangements between Internet access service providers and Internet application providers to favor some traffic over other traf-fic is considered unreasonable discrimination. In Europe the focus is on mini-mum traffic quality requirements. It can be shown that neither market power nor universal service arguments can justify traffic quality regulation. In particular, heterogeneous demand for traffic quality for delay sensitive versus delay insen-sitive applications requires traffic quality differentiation, priority pricing and evolutionary development of minimal traffic qualities.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Diskussionsbeitrag ; No. 136
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Knieps, Günter
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Institut für Verkehrswissenschaft und Regionalpolitik
- (where)
-
Freiburg i. Br.
- (when)
-
2011
- Handle
- Last update
- 10.03.2025, 11:41 AM CET
Data provider
This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Arbeitspapier
Associated
- Knieps, Günter
- Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Institut für Verkehrswissenschaft und Regionalpolitik
Time of origin
- 2011
Other Objects (12)
Market driven network neutrality and the fallacies of internet traffic quality regulation
Market driven network neutrality and the fallacy of a two-tiered Internet traffic regulation
Network neutrality and the evolution of the internet
Network Neutrality and the Evolution of the Internet
The net neutrality debate and the German communications and competition law
Qualitäts- und Preisdifferenzierung im Internet
The fallacies of network neutrality regulation
The fallacies of network neutrality regulation
Internet der Dinge und die Zukunft der Netzökonomie
Competition in telecommunications and the internet services: A dynamic perspective
Internet of Things and the network economics of operator platforms
Internet of Things, Virtual Networks and the Economics of Shared Mobility
Market driven network neutrality and the fallacies of internet traffic quality regulation
Market driven network neutrality and the fallacy of a two-tiered Internet traffic regulation
Network neutrality and the evolution of the internet
Network Neutrality and the Evolution of the Internet
The net neutrality debate and the German communications and competition law
Qualitäts- und Preisdifferenzierung im Internet
The fallacies of network neutrality regulation
The fallacies of network neutrality regulation
Internet der Dinge und die Zukunft der Netzökonomie
Competition in telecommunications and the internet services: A dynamic perspective
Internet of Things and the network economics of operator platforms
Internet of Things, Virtual Networks and the Economics of Shared Mobility
Market driven network neutrality and the fallacies of internet traffic quality regulation
Market driven network neutrality and the fallacy of a two-tiered Internet traffic regulation
Network neutrality and the evolution of the internet
Network Neutrality and the Evolution of the Internet
The net neutrality debate and the German communications and competition law
Qualitäts- und Preisdifferenzierung im Internet
The fallacies of network neutrality regulation
The fallacies of network neutrality regulation
Internet der Dinge und die Zukunft der Netzökonomie
Competition in telecommunications and the internet services: A dynamic perspective
Internet of Things and the network economics of operator platforms