- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Natural risk warning: comparison of two methodologies ; volume:2 ; year:2006 ; pages:335-338
Advances in geosciences ; 2 (2006), 335-338
- Creator
-
Cavallo, A.
Giannoni, F.
- DOI
-
10.5194/adgeo-2-335-2006
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2017121512135
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
2025-08-15T07:28:29+0200
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Cavallo, A.
- Giannoni, F.
Other Objects (12)
Comparison of ASR Mitigation Methodologies
Plasma oxalate: comparison of methodologies
Early warning score validation methodologies and performance metrics: a systematic review
Quantitative comparison between two different methodologies to define rainfall thresholds for landslide forecasting
Source apportionment and sensitivity analysis: two methodologies with two different purposes
Measuring Regional Multipliers: A Comparison between Two Different Methodologies for the Case Of The Italian Regions
Comparison of named entity recognition methodologies in biomedical documents
Inherent safety evaluation in process plants— a comparison of methodologies
Evaluation of coastal vulnerability to flooding: comparison of two different methodologies adopted by the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy)
Public Investment Regional Allocation: Evaluation of applicability of two methodologies
Assessing variability of wind speed: comparison and validation of 27 methodologies
Comparison of five different methodologies for evaluating ankle–foot orthosis stiffness
Comparison of ASR Mitigation Methodologies
Plasma oxalate: comparison of methodologies
Early warning score validation methodologies and performance metrics: a systematic review
Quantitative comparison between two different methodologies to define rainfall thresholds for landslide forecasting
Source apportionment and sensitivity analysis: two methodologies with two different purposes
Measuring Regional Multipliers: A Comparison between Two Different Methodologies for the Case Of The Italian Regions
Comparison of named entity recognition methodologies in biomedical documents
Inherent safety evaluation in process plants— a comparison of methodologies
Evaluation of coastal vulnerability to flooding: comparison of two different methodologies adopted by the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy)
Public Investment Regional Allocation: Evaluation of applicability of two methodologies
Assessing variability of wind speed: comparison and validation of 27 methodologies
Comparison of five different methodologies for evaluating ankle–foot orthosis stiffness
Comparison of ASR Mitigation Methodologies
Plasma oxalate: comparison of methodologies
Early warning score validation methodologies and performance metrics: a systematic review
Quantitative comparison between two different methodologies to define rainfall thresholds for landslide forecasting
Source apportionment and sensitivity analysis: two methodologies with two different purposes
Measuring Regional Multipliers: A Comparison between Two Different Methodologies for the Case Of The Italian Regions
Comparison of named entity recognition methodologies in biomedical documents
Inherent safety evaluation in process plants— a comparison of methodologies
Evaluation of coastal vulnerability to flooding: comparison of two different methodologies adopted by the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy)
Public Investment Regional Allocation: Evaluation of applicability of two methodologies
Assessing variability of wind speed: comparison and validation of 27 methodologies