Arbeitspapier

Promoting Reproducibility and Replicability in Political Science

This article reviews and summarizes current reproduction and replication practices in political science. We first provide definitions for reproducibility and replicability. We then review data availability policies for 28 leading political science journals and present the results from a survey of editors about their willingness to publish comments and replications. We discuss new initiatives that seek to promote and generate highquality reproductions and replications. Finally, we make the case for standards and practices that may help increase data availability, reproducibility, and replicability in political science.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: I4R Discussion Paper Series ; No. 100

Classification
Wirtschaft
Subject
Reproducibility
replicability
political science

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Brodeur, Abel
Esterling, Kevin
Ankel-Peters, Jörg
Bueno, Natália S.
Desposato, Scott
Dreber, Anna
Genovese, Federica
Green, Donald P.
Hepplewhite, Matthew
Hoces de la Guardia, Fernando
Johannesson, Magnus
Kotsadam, Andreas
Miguel, Edward
Velez, Yamil R.
Young, Lauren
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Institute for Replication (I4R)
(where)
s.l.
(when)
2024

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:43 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Brodeur, Abel
  • Esterling, Kevin
  • Ankel-Peters, Jörg
  • Bueno, Natália S.
  • Desposato, Scott
  • Dreber, Anna
  • Genovese, Federica
  • Green, Donald P.
  • Hepplewhite, Matthew
  • Hoces de la Guardia, Fernando
  • Johannesson, Magnus
  • Kotsadam, Andreas
  • Miguel, Edward
  • Velez, Yamil R.
  • Young, Lauren
  • Institute for Replication (I4R)

Time of origin

  • 2024

Other Objects (12)