Reanalyzing the spatial representativeness of snow depth at automated monitoring stations using airborne lidar data

Abstract n = 476 total samples). In about 50 % of cases, station depths were at least 10 cm higher than areal-mean snow depth (from lidar) at 0.5 to 4 km scales. The nearest 50 m lidar pixels had lower bias and were more often representative of the areal-mean snow depth than coincident stations. The closest 3 m lidar pixel often agreed with station snow depth to within 10 cm, suggesting differences between station snow depth and the nearest 50 m lidar pixel result from highly localized conditions and not the measurement method. Representativeness decreased as scale increased up to ∼ 6 km, mainly explained by the elevation of a site relative to the larger area. Relative values of vegetation and southness did not have significant impacts on site representativeness. The sign of bias at individual snow stations is temporally consistent, suggesting the relationship between station depth and that of the surrounding area may be predictable. Improving understanding of snow station representativeness could allow for more accurate validation of modeled and remotely sensed data.

Object Details

• Location: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
• Extent: Online-Ressource
• Language: Englisch

References and Relationships

• Bibliographic citation: Reanalyzing the spatial representativeness of snow depth at automated monitoring stations using airborne lidar data ; volume:18 ; number:8 ; year:2024 ; pages:3495-3512 ; extent:18 ; The Cryosphere ; 18, Heft 8 (2024), 3495-3512 (gesamt 18)

Contributors, Places and Time

• Creator: Herbert, Jordan N. ; Raleigh, Mark S. ; Small, Eric E.

Further information

• DOI: 10.5194/tc-18-3495-2024
• URN: urn:nbn:de:101:1-2408150440097.383262292541
• Rights: Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
• Last update: 14.08.2025, 11:02 AM CEST