Identification and management of spurious hemolysis: controversies, concerns and criticisms
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Identification and management of spurious hemolysis: controversies, concerns and criticisms ; volume:57 ; number:11 ; year:2019 ; pages:1647-1649 ; extent:3
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine ; 57, Heft 11 (2019), 1647-1649 (gesamt 3)
- Creator
- DOI
-
10.1515/cclm-2019-0501
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022052110421688560367
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:27 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Lippi, Giuseppe
- Plebani, Mario
Other Objects (12)
Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together
Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
Value-based laboratory medicine: the time is now
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed
Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
Analytical quality: an unfinished journey
Journal impact factor: the debate continues
Fifty years of CCLM – invitation to join us for a reception in Milan
Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture
Home pregnancy tests: quality first
Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together
Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
Value-based laboratory medicine: the time is now
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed
Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
Analytical quality: an unfinished journey
Journal impact factor: the debate continues
Fifty years of CCLM – invitation to join us for a reception in Milan
Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture
Home pregnancy tests: quality first
Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
Quality in laboratory medicine and the Journal: walking together
Harmonizing the post-analytical phase: focus on the laboratory report
Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
Value-based laboratory medicine: the time is now
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed
Blood self-sampling: friend or foe?
Analytical quality: an unfinished journey
Journal impact factor: the debate continues
Fifty years of CCLM – invitation to join us for a reception in Milan
Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture