- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISBN
-
9783540942634
3540942637
9780387942636
0387942637
- Dimensions
-
24 cm
- Extent
-
138 S.
- Language
-
Deutsch
- Notes
-
graph. Darst.
Litteraturverz. S. 131 - 135
- Bibliographic citation
-
Lecture notes in statistics ; Vol. 86
- Keyword
-
Logistische Verteilung
Regressionsanalyse
Fehlende Daten
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (where)
-
New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, London, Paris, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Barcelona, Budapest
- (who)
-
Springer
- (when)
-
1994
- Creator
- Table of contents
- Rights
-
Bei diesem Objekt liegt nur das Inhaltsverzeichnis digital vor. Der Zugriff darauf ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
11.06.2025, 1:58 PM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Vach, Werner
- Springer
Time of origin
- 1994
Other Objects (12)
Rangquantilstatistiken
Value-based and benefit-based strategies in deciding to bring a test into use should be distinguished
On the use of comparison regions in visualizing stochastic uncertainty in some two‐parameter estimation problems
Anchor-based minimal important difference values are often sensitive to the distribution of the change score
Improvement of the average linkage method
Analysis of isp script files as an example for the retrospective analysis of machine written records
Visualizing uncertainty in a two-dimensional estimate using confidence and comparison regions
On the use of comparison regions in visualizing stochastic uncertainty in some two‐parameter estimation problems
Constructing treatment selection rules based on an estimated treatment effect function: different approaches to take stochastic uncertainty into account have a substantial effect on performance
Potential role of “the compensating benefit” in claiming non-inferiority
A framework to assess the impact of applying formal criteria to check clinical relevance on top of statistical significance
A framework to assess the added value of subgroup analyses when the overall treatment effect (TE) was significant
Rangquantilstatistiken
Value-based and benefit-based strategies in deciding to bring a test into use should be distinguished
On the use of comparison regions in visualizing stochastic uncertainty in some two‐parameter estimation problems
Anchor-based minimal important difference values are often sensitive to the distribution of the change score
Improvement of the average linkage method
Analysis of isp script files as an example for the retrospective analysis of machine written records
Visualizing uncertainty in a two-dimensional estimate using confidence and comparison regions
On the use of comparison regions in visualizing stochastic uncertainty in some two‐parameter estimation problems
Constructing treatment selection rules based on an estimated treatment effect function: different approaches to take stochastic uncertainty into account have a substantial effect on performance
Potential role of “the compensating benefit” in claiming non-inferiority
A framework to assess the impact of applying formal criteria to check clinical relevance on top of statistical significance
A framework to assess the added value of subgroup analyses when the overall treatment effect (TE) was significant
Rangquantilstatistiken
Value-based and benefit-based strategies in deciding to bring a test into use should be distinguished
On the use of comparison regions in visualizing stochastic uncertainty in some two‐parameter estimation problems
Anchor-based minimal important difference values are often sensitive to the distribution of the change score
Improvement of the average linkage method
Analysis of isp script files as an example for the retrospective analysis of machine written records
Visualizing uncertainty in a two-dimensional estimate using confidence and comparison regions
On the use of comparison regions in visualizing stochastic uncertainty in some two‐parameter estimation problems
Constructing treatment selection rules based on an estimated treatment effect function: different approaches to take stochastic uncertainty into account have a substantial effect on performance
Potential role of “the compensating benefit” in claiming non-inferiority
A framework to assess the impact of applying formal criteria to check clinical relevance on top of statistical significance