Arbeitspapier
Gigerenzer the Decided: A Tale of Difficult Distinctions
This paper provides an overview of the work of Gigerenzer, thereby focusing on his criticisms of the Heuristics and Biases theory of Kahneman and Tversky. It is proposed that Gigerenzer's work can be both thematically and chronologically organized as: historical research on statistics => criticism on Kahneman and Tversky => the bounded rationality research program. That is, Gigerenzer' attacks on the Heuristics and Biases program derive from his historical work on Brunswik and Thurstone. In turn, these attacks functioned as the driving force behind the development of the bounded rationality research program. Behind the debate, it is argued, lies a fundamental different idea of how human decision-making is to be understood and investigated.
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
Series: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper ; No. 05-113/2
- Classification
-
Wirtschaft
History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches
History of Economic Thought since 1925: General
History of Economic Thought: Individuals
- Subject
-
Gigerenzer
Kahneman and Tversky
Cognitive Psychology
Bounded rationality
decision-making
- Event
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (who)
-
Heukelom, Floris
- Event
-
Veröffentlichung
- (who)
-
Tinbergen Institute
- (where)
-
Amsterdam and Rotterdam
- (when)
-
2005
- Handle
- Last update
-
10.03.2025, 11:45 AM CET
Data provider
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Object type
- Arbeitspapier
Associated
- Heukelom, Floris
- Tinbergen Institute
Time of origin
- 2005