Arbeitspapier

Gigerenzer the Decided: A Tale of Difficult Distinctions

This paper provides an overview of the work of Gigerenzer, thereby focusing on his criticisms of the Heuristics and Biases theory of Kahneman and Tversky. It is proposed that Gigerenzer's work can be both thematically and chronologically organized as: historical research on statistics => criticism on Kahneman and Tversky => the bounded rationality research program. That is, Gigerenzer' attacks on the Heuristics and Biases program derive from his historical work on Brunswik and Thurstone. In turn, these attacks functioned as the driving force behind the development of the bounded rationality research program. Behind the debate, it is argued, lies a fundamental different idea of how human decision-making is to be understood and investigated.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper ; No. 05-113/2

Classification
Wirtschaft
History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches
History of Economic Thought since 1925: General
History of Economic Thought: Individuals
Subject
Gigerenzer
Kahneman and Tversky
Cognitive Psychology
Bounded rationality
decision-making

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Heukelom, Floris
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Tinbergen Institute
(where)
Amsterdam and Rotterdam
(when)
2005

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:45 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Heukelom, Floris
  • Tinbergen Institute

Time of origin

  • 2005

Other Objects (12)