Quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analyses of nursing interventions conducted by Korean reviewers
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2288
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analyses of nursing interventions conducted by Korean reviewers ; volume:12 ; number:1 ; day:28 ; month:8 ; year:2012 ; pages:1-6 ; date:12.2012
BMC medical research methodology ; 12, Heft 1 (28.8.2012), 1-6, 12.2012
- Creator
-
Seo, Hyun-Ju
- Contributor
-
Kim, Kyeong Uoon
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1471-2288-12-129
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016032134097
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:44 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Seo, Hyun-Ju
- Kim, Kyeong Uoon
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses
How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing comparative test accuracy questions
Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination
Reviewing systematic literature reviews: ten key questions and criteria for reviewers
Reviewing systematic literature reviews: ten key questions and criteria for reviewers
Value of preclinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in pediatric research
An optimal search filter for retrieving systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Reviewers
Acupuncture for Low Back Pain: Reevaluation of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey
The Market for Reviews: Strategic Behavior of Online Product Reviewers with Monetary Incentives
Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses
How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing comparative test accuracy questions
Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination
Reviewing systematic literature reviews: ten key questions and criteria for reviewers
Reviewing systematic literature reviews: ten key questions and criteria for reviewers
Value of preclinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in pediatric research
An optimal search filter for retrieving systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Reviewers
Acupuncture for Low Back Pain: Reevaluation of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey
The Market for Reviews: Strategic Behavior of Online Product Reviewers with Monetary Incentives
Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses
How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses addressing comparative test accuracy questions
Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination
Reviewing systematic literature reviews: ten key questions and criteria for reviewers
Reviewing systematic literature reviews: ten key questions and criteria for reviewers
Value of preclinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in pediatric research
An optimal search filter for retrieving systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Reviewers
Acupuncture for Low Back Pain: Reevaluation of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey