Classifying cases in federal studies: an illustration of why political scientists should do more cluster analysis
Abstract: "Typologies are widely used in research on federalism, e.g. to distinguish dual from cooperative or coming-together from holding-together federations. More general, ideal types, archetypes and categories are frequently used in political science research to define concepts and classify cases. As recently as in 2014, Filho et al. pointed out that Cluster Analysis is still hardly used when it comes to developing typologies in political science. Rather, political scientists rely on more intuitive methods or factor analysis. Our paper argues that Cluster Analysis is of great usefulness because it a) focuses on the relationship between cases and not variables and b) draws on empirical data when identifying the clusters. This paper proposes to apply this fruitful approach to the field of federalism to exemplify its major heuristic potential. Furthermore, we emphasize that testing the secondary validity is a crucial step. Our paper provides two original examples from comparative federal po
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Anmerkungen
-
Veröffentlichungsversion
begutachtet (peer reviewed)
In: Federal Governance ; 13 (2016) 1 ; 68-86
- Klassifikation
-
Politik
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Mannheim
- (wann)
-
2016
- Urheber
-
Schnabel, Johanna
Wirths, Damien
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-48544-7
- Rechteinformation
-
Open Access unbekannt; Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:28 MESZ
Datenpartner
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Schnabel, Johanna
- Wirths, Damien
Entstanden
- 2016
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Classifying cases in federal studies: an illustration of why political scientists should do more cluster analysis
Why scientists should study chess
How activist should scientists be?
Why are scientists not managers!?
What should scientists do about (harmful) interactive effects?
Bioethicists Should Be Helping Scientists Think About Race
Why should England wait?
Why Should Clinicians Publish?
Codes of conduct should help scientists navigate societal expectations
Streaming: Why should I care?
Why Should Majority Voting Be Unfair?
Why Cities Should not be Subsidized
Classifying cases in federal studies: an illustration of why political scientists should do more cluster analysis
Why scientists should study chess
How activist should scientists be?
Why are scientists not managers!?
What should scientists do about (harmful) interactive effects?
Bioethicists Should Be Helping Scientists Think About Race
Why should England wait?
Why Should Clinicians Publish?
Codes of conduct should help scientists navigate societal expectations
Streaming: Why should I care?
Why Should Majority Voting Be Unfair?
Why Cities Should not be Subsidized
Classifying cases in federal studies: an illustration of why political scientists should do more cluster analysis
Why scientists should study chess
How activist should scientists be?
Why are scientists not managers!?
What should scientists do about (harmful) interactive effects?
Bioethicists Should Be Helping Scientists Think About Race
Why should England wait?
Why Should Clinicians Publish?
Codes of conduct should help scientists navigate societal expectations
Streaming: Why should I care?
Why Should Majority Voting Be Unfair?