A defense of van Fraassen’s critique of abductive inference : reply to Psillos
- Standort
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Umfang
-
Online-Ressource
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
In: The Philosophical Quarterly ; 47 (1997), 188. - S. 305-321. - Oxford University Press (OUP). - ISSN 0031-8094. - eISSN 1467-9213
- Klassifikation
-
Politik
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wo)
-
Konstanz
- (wer)
-
KOPS Universität Konstanz
- (wann)
-
1997
- Urheber
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1gh8rc1ha4ww54
- Rechteinformation
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
15.08.2025, 07:36 MESZ
Datenpartner
Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Beteiligte
- Ladyman, James
- Douven, Igor
- Horsten, Leon
- Van Fraassen, Bas C.
- KOPS Universität Konstanz
Entstanden
- 1997
Ähnliche Objekte (12)
Reply. Notes on Post-critique
Reply of Defense Counsel to the Closing Brief of the Prosecution
Document of the Defense (reply to the Trialbrief of Prosecution) v. 15.02.1948
Reply of the Defense to the Prosecution Closing Brief against Schellenberg
Replybrief of the Defense to the Reply of the Prosecution of 17.06.1949, of 27.06.1949
Is There Anything Like Indian Logic? Anumāna, ‘Inference’ and Inference in the Critique of Jayarāśi Bhaṭṭa
Defense Rejoinder of 29.06.1949 to the prosecution's reply to the Defense Petition concerning errors in the Judgment
Reply of the Defense on behalf of Carl Ritter, to the Prosecution Brief of 17.06.1949.
Inference to the best prediction : a reply to Wanja Wiese
Authors’ Reply: Statistical inference and effect measures in abstracts of randomized trials, 1975-2021
Reply of the Defense vom 25.06.1949 in the Case of Gottlob Berger to the Reply of the Prosecution of 17.06.1949 (wie oben Nr. D 20)
Human intuition as a defense against attribute inference
Reply. Notes on Post-critique
Reply of Defense Counsel to the Closing Brief of the Prosecution
Document of the Defense (reply to the Trialbrief of Prosecution) v. 15.02.1948
Reply of the Defense to the Prosecution Closing Brief against Schellenberg
Replybrief of the Defense to the Reply of the Prosecution of 17.06.1949, of 27.06.1949
Is There Anything Like Indian Logic? Anumāna, ‘Inference’ and Inference in the Critique of Jayarāśi Bhaṭṭa
Defense Rejoinder of 29.06.1949 to the prosecution's reply to the Defense Petition concerning errors in the Judgment
Reply of the Defense on behalf of Carl Ritter, to the Prosecution Brief of 17.06.1949.
Inference to the best prediction : a reply to Wanja Wiese
Authors’ Reply: Statistical inference and effect measures in abstracts of randomized trials, 1975-2021
Reply of the Defense vom 25.06.1949 in the Case of Gottlob Berger to the Reply of the Prosecution of 17.06.1949 (wie oben Nr. D 20)
Human intuition as a defense against attribute inference
Reply. Notes on Post-critique
Reply of Defense Counsel to the Closing Brief of the Prosecution
Document of the Defense (reply to the Trialbrief of Prosecution) v. 15.02.1948
Reply of the Defense to the Prosecution Closing Brief against Schellenberg
Replybrief of the Defense to the Reply of the Prosecution of 17.06.1949, of 27.06.1949
Is There Anything Like Indian Logic? Anumāna, ‘Inference’ and Inference in the Critique of Jayarāśi Bhaṭṭa
Defense Rejoinder of 29.06.1949 to the prosecution's reply to the Defense Petition concerning errors in the Judgment
Reply of the Defense on behalf of Carl Ritter, to the Prosecution Brief of 17.06.1949.
Inference to the best prediction : a reply to Wanja Wiese
Authors’ Reply: Statistical inference and effect measures in abstracts of randomized trials, 1975-2021
Reply of the Defense vom 25.06.1949 in the Case of Gottlob Berger to the Reply of the Prosecution of 17.06.1949 (wie oben Nr. D 20)