Unpacking the ‘black box of horrendousness’: a qualitative exploration of the barriers and facilitators to conducting trials involving adults lacking capacity to consent
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1745-6215
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Unpacking the ‘black box of horrendousness’: a qualitative exploration of the barriers and facilitators to conducting trials involving adults lacking capacity to consent ; volume:23 ; number:1 ; day:6 ; month:6 ; year:2022 ; pages:1-25 ; date:12.2022
Trials ; 23, Heft 1 (6.6.2022), 1-25, 12.2022
- Classification
-
Recht
- Creator
-
Shepherd, Victoria
Hood, Kerenza
Wood, Fiona
- Contributor
-
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/s13063-022-06422-6
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2022080322195942297066
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
15.08.2025, 7:34 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Shepherd, Victoria
- Hood, Kerenza
- Wood, Fiona
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: the impact of research regulation on ‘evidence biased’ medicine
Consent to Govern
Response to: Regarding “Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings”
An under-represented and underserved population in trials: methodological, structural, and systemic barriers to the inclusion of adults lacking capacity to consent
Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings
Giving Consent to the Ineffable
“I Did Not Consent To”
Coercion and capacity to consent
Development of a measure to assess the quality of proxy decisions about research participation on behalf of adults lacking capacity to consent: the Combined Scale for Proxy Informed Consent Decisions (CONCORD scale)
Regarding “Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings”
Recruitment interventions for trials involving adults lacking capacity to consent: methodological and ethical considerations for designing Studies Within a Trial (SWATs)
Unpacking Urban Agriculture: Business Contributions to Circular Economy
Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: the impact of research regulation on ‘evidence biased’ medicine
Consent to Govern
Response to: Regarding “Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings”
An under-represented and underserved population in trials: methodological, structural, and systemic barriers to the inclusion of adults lacking capacity to consent
Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings
Giving Consent to the Ineffable
“I Did Not Consent To”
Coercion and capacity to consent
Development of a measure to assess the quality of proxy decisions about research participation on behalf of adults lacking capacity to consent: the Combined Scale for Proxy Informed Consent Decisions (CONCORD scale)
Regarding “Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings”
Recruitment interventions for trials involving adults lacking capacity to consent: methodological and ethical considerations for designing Studies Within a Trial (SWATs)
Unpacking Urban Agriculture: Business Contributions to Circular Economy
Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: the impact of research regulation on ‘evidence biased’ medicine
Consent to Govern
Response to: Regarding “Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings”
An under-represented and underserved population in trials: methodological, structural, and systemic barriers to the inclusion of adults lacking capacity to consent
Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings
Giving Consent to the Ineffable
“I Did Not Consent To”
Coercion and capacity to consent
Development of a measure to assess the quality of proxy decisions about research participation on behalf of adults lacking capacity to consent: the Combined Scale for Proxy Informed Consent Decisions (CONCORD scale)
Regarding “Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings”
Recruitment interventions for trials involving adults lacking capacity to consent: methodological and ethical considerations for designing Studies Within a Trial (SWATs)