- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
1471-2393
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Developing criteria for Cesarean Section using the RAND appropriateness method ; volume:10 ; number:1 ; day:14 ; month:9 ; year:2010 ; pages:1-8 ; date:12.2010
BMC pregnancy and childbirth ; 10, Heft 1 (14.9.2010), 1-8, 12.2010
- Contributor
-
Ostovar, Rahim
Rashidian, Arash
Pourreza, Abolghasem
Rashidi, Batool Hossein
Hantooshzadeh, Sedigheh
Ardebili, Hassan Eftekhar
Mahmoudi, Mahmood
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/1471-2393-10-52
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016032140935
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 10:51 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Ostovar, Rahim
- Rashidian, Arash
- Pourreza, Abolghasem
- Rashidi, Batool Hossein
- Hantooshzadeh, Sedigheh
- Ardebili, Hassan Eftekhar
- Mahmoudi, Mahmood
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Resectable Rectal Cancer
Appropriateness criteria of FDG PET/CT in oncology
Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification
Prospektive Anwendung der EuroHip-Appropriateness Criteria zur Prothesenimplantation bei Coxarthrose
Assessment of the appropriateness of cardiovascular preventive medication in older people: using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method
American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: a bibliometric analysis of panel members
Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique
Response to: American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: A bibliometric analysis of panel members
Upper GI series in infants and children with vomiting: insights into ACR appropriateness criteria
The management of heart failure cardiogenic shock: an international RAND appropriateness panel
Appropriateness of colonoscopies in a Tunisian endoscopy center: factors and EPAGE-I/II criteria comparison
Identifying ‘avoidable harm’ in family practice: a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method consensus study
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Resectable Rectal Cancer
Appropriateness criteria of FDG PET/CT in oncology
Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification
Prospektive Anwendung der EuroHip-Appropriateness Criteria zur Prothesenimplantation bei Coxarthrose
Assessment of the appropriateness of cardiovascular preventive medication in older people: using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method
American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: a bibliometric analysis of panel members
Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique
Response to: American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: A bibliometric analysis of panel members
Upper GI series in infants and children with vomiting: insights into ACR appropriateness criteria
The management of heart failure cardiogenic shock: an international RAND appropriateness panel
Appropriateness of colonoscopies in a Tunisian endoscopy center: factors and EPAGE-I/II criteria comparison
Identifying ‘avoidable harm’ in family practice: a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method consensus study
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Resectable Rectal Cancer
Appropriateness criteria of FDG PET/CT in oncology
Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification
Prospektive Anwendung der EuroHip-Appropriateness Criteria zur Prothesenimplantation bei Coxarthrose
Assessment of the appropriateness of cardiovascular preventive medication in older people: using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method
American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: a bibliometric analysis of panel members
Developing quality indicators for cross-sectoral psycho-oncology in Germany: combining the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method with a Delphi technique
Response to: American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®: A bibliometric analysis of panel members
Upper GI series in infants and children with vomiting: insights into ACR appropriateness criteria
The management of heart failure cardiogenic shock: an international RAND appropriateness panel
Appropriateness of colonoscopies in a Tunisian endoscopy center: factors and EPAGE-I/II criteria comparison