Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- ISSN
-
2046-4053
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Notes
-
online resource.
- Bibliographic citation
-
Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review ; volume:3 ; number:1 ; day:23 ; month:7 ; year:2014 ; pages:1-7 ; date:12.2014
Systematic Reviews ; 3, Heft 1 (23.7.2014), 1-7, 12.2014
- Creator
-
Pham, Ba’
- Contributor
-
Tu, Hong Anh Thi
Han, Dolly
Pechlivanoglou, Petros
Miller, Fiona
Rac, Valeria
Chin, Warren
Tricco, Andrea C.
Paulden, Mike
Bielecki, Joanna
Krahn, Murray
SpringerLink (Online service)
- DOI
-
10.1186/2046-4053-3-81
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:1111-2016071826469
- Rights
-
Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
- 14.08.2025, 10:55 AM CEST
Data provider
This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Pham, Ba’
- Tu, Hong Anh Thi
- Han, Dolly
- Pechlivanoglou, Petros
- Miller, Fiona
- Rac, Valeria
- Chin, Warren
- Tricco, Andrea C.
- Paulden, Mike
- Bielecki, Joanna
- Krahn, Murray
- SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Objects (12)
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data
Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency
How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews?
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review
Comparative safety and efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review
Using a distribution-based approach and systematic review methods to derive minimum clinically important differences
Rapid reviews for health policy and systems decision-making: more important than ever before
Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions