Right, Morals and the Categorical Imperative

Abstract: In this paper I examine the relationship between the principle of right and the principle of morals [Sitten] in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. My interpretation denies that the principle of right is derived from the categorical imperative, but neither does it adhere to the independence thesis. I present a third way of understanding the relationship between the law of right and the universal law of morals: the latter is needed in order to formulate the former, but it is not sufficient. The principle of right is obtained by applying the categorical imperative to the concept of right. I highlight the discussion on the subject within the late eighteenth-century German natural law tradition and similar arguments found in Achenwall.

Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Extent
Online-Ressource
Language
Deutsch

Bibliographic citation
Right, Morals and the Categorical Imperative ; volume:114 ; number:3 ; year:2023 ; pages:513-538 ; extent:26
Kant-Studien ; 114, Heft 3 (2023), 513-538 (gesamt 26)

Creator
Tomassini, Fiorella

DOI
10.1515/kant-2023-2030
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2023090814202257685500
Rights
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
14.08.2025, 10:58 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Associated

  • Tomassini, Fiorella

Other Objects (12)