Arbeitspapier

Election Systems, the "Beauty Premium" in Politics, and the Beauty of Dissent

We ask three questions. First, do election systems differ in how they translate physical attractiveness of candidates into electoral success? Second, do political parties strategically exploit the “beauty premium” when deciding on which candidates to nominate, and, third, do elected MPs use their beauty premium to reap some independence from their party? Using the German election system that combines first-past-the-post election with party-list proportional representation, our results show that plurality elections provide more scope for translating physical attractiveness into electoral success than proportional representation. Whether political parties strategically use the beauty premium to optimize their electoral objectives is less clear. Physically attractive MPs, however, allow themselves to dissent more often, i.e. they vote more often against the party line than their less attractive peers.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: CESifo Working Paper ; No. 8296

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
Public Sector Labor Markets
Labor Discrimination: General
Thema
attractiveness of politicians
safe district
party strategies
electoral success
electoral system

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Potrafke, Niklas
Rösch, Marcus
Ursprung, Heinrich
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo)
(wo)
Munich
(wann)
2020

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
10.03.2025, 11:43 MEZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Potrafke, Niklas
  • Rösch, Marcus
  • Ursprung, Heinrich
  • Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo)

Entstanden

  • 2020

Ähnliche Objekte (12)