Arbeitspapier

Can endogenously chosen institutions mitigate the free-rider problem and reduce perverse punishment?

Previous experiments on public goods dilemmas have found that the opportunity to punish leads to higher contributions and reduces the free rider problem; however, a substantial amount of punishment is targeted on high contributors. In the experiment reported here, subjects are given the opportunity to vote on rules governing punishment. We found that, from their first opportunity to vote, no group ever allowed punishment of high contributors, most groups eventually voted to allow punishment of low contributors, and a minority of groups never allowed any form of punishment. Groups allowing punishment of low but not high contributors had significantly higher efficiency and contributions than comparison groups with unrestricted punishment.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Series: Working Paper ; No. 2005-13

Classification
Wirtschaft
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Individual
Design of Experiments: Laboratory, Group Behavior
Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
Public Goods
Subject
Public goods
collective action
punishment
voting
institutions
Öffentliches Gut
Trittbrettfahrerverhalten
Test
Theorie

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Ertan, Arhan
Page, Talbot
Putterman, Louis
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Brown University, Department of Economics
(where)
Providence, RI
(when)
2005

Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:45 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Arbeitspapier

Associated

  • Ertan, Arhan
  • Page, Talbot
  • Putterman, Louis
  • Brown University, Department of Economics

Time of origin

  • 2005

Other Objects (12)