Konferenzbeitrag

Which Dimensions of Narratives are Relevant for Human Judgments of Story Equivalence?

We present an experimental approach to determining natural dimensions of story comparison. The results show that untrained test subjects generally do not privilege structural information. When asked to justify sameness ratings, they may refer to content, but when asked to state differences, they mostly refer to style, concrete events, details and motifs. We conclude that adequate formal models of narratives must represent such non-structural data.

Which Dimensions of Narratives are Relevant for Human Judgments of Story Equivalence?

Urheber*in: Fisseni, Bernhard; Löwe, Benedikt

In copyright

Language
Englisch

Subject
Erzählforschung
Handlungsstruktur <Literatur>
Computerlinguistik
Vergleichbarkeit
Sprache

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Fisseni, Bernhard
Löwe, Benedikt
Event
Veröffentlichung
(when)
2018-11-02

URN
urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-81864
Last update
06.03.2025, 9:00 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache - Bibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Konferenzbeitrag

Associated

  • Fisseni, Bernhard
  • Löwe, Benedikt

Time of origin

  • 2018-11-02

Other Objects (12)