Defining documentation burden (DocBurden) and excess DocBurden for all health professionals: A scoping review

Objective: Efforts to reduce documentation burden (DocBurden) for all health professionals (HP) are aligned with national initiatives to improve clinician wellness and patient safety. Yet DocBurden has not been precisely defined, limiting national conversations and rigorous, reproducible, and meaningful measures. Increasing attention to DocBurden motivated this work to establish a standard definition of DocBurden, with the emergence of excessive DocBurden as a term. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of DocBurden definitions and descriptions, searching six databases for scholarly, peer-reviewed, and gray literature sources, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extensions for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidance. For the concept clarification phase of work, we used the American Nursing Informatics Association (ANIA)’s 6-Domains of Burden Framework. Results: A total of 153 articles were included based on a priori criteria. Most articles described a focus on DocBurden, but only 18% (n=28) provided a definition. We define excessive DocBurden as the stress and unnecessarily heavy work a HP or healthcare team experiences when usability of documentation systems and documentation activities (i.e., generation, review, analysis and synthesis of patient data) are not aligned in support of care delivery. A negative connotation was attached to burden without a neutral state in included sources, which does not align with dictionary definitions of burden. Conclusions: Existing literature does not distinguish between a baseline or required task load to conduct patient care resulting from usability issues (DocBurden), and the unnecessarily heavy tasks and requirements that contribute to excessive DocBurden. Our definition of excessive DocBurden explicitly acknowledges this distinction, to support development of meaningful measures for understanding and intervening on excessive DocBurden locally, nationally and internationally.

Location
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
Extent
Online-Ressource
Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Defining documentation burden (DocBurden) and excess DocBurden for all health professionals: A scoping review ; day:13 ; month:08 ; year:2024
Applied clinical informatics ; (13.08.2024)

Classification
Soziale Probleme, Sozialdienste, Versicherungen

Contributor
Levy, Deborah R.
Withall, Jennifer
Mishuris, Rebecca Grochow
Tiase, Vicky
Diamond, Courtney J.
Douthit, Brian
Grabowska, Monika
Lee, Rachel
Moy, Amanda
Sengstack, Patricia
Adler-Milstein, Julia
Detmer, Don E.
Johnson, Kevin B.
Cimino, James J.
Corley, Sarah T.
Murphy, Judy
Rosenbloom, Trent
Cato, Kenrick
Rossetti, Sarah Collins

DOI
10.1055/a-2385-1654
URN
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2409261133220.754577557795
Rights
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
Last update
15.08.2025, 7:20 AM CEST

Data provider

This object is provided by:
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Associated

  • Levy, Deborah R.
  • Withall, Jennifer
  • Mishuris, Rebecca Grochow
  • Tiase, Vicky
  • Diamond, Courtney J.
  • Douthit, Brian
  • Grabowska, Monika
  • Lee, Rachel
  • Moy, Amanda
  • Sengstack, Patricia
  • Adler-Milstein, Julia
  • Detmer, Don E.
  • Johnson, Kevin B.
  • Cimino, James J.
  • Corley, Sarah T.
  • Murphy, Judy
  • Rosenbloom, Trent
  • Cato, Kenrick
  • Rossetti, Sarah Collins

Other Objects (12)