The Democratic Self-Defence of Constitutional Courts
Abstract: Courts around the world are under attack. They are being captured, packed, threatened, and their authority and powers are being limited by governments that seek to undermine the democratic constitutional order. Once courts are weakened or captured, it is easier for these governments to undermine other democratic institutions and even set courts themselves against democracy. Accordingly, using the rationale of ‘militant democracy’, this article proposes the theory of democratic self-defence of constitutional courts. According to this theory, constitutional courts (including apex courts with constitutional review powers) should declare the unconstitutionality of reforms to their institutional design when these are instrumental to a process of democratic decay. Not only that they should do so, but they must do so – as a duty – when the viability of the democratic system of government is at stake. The aim of this self-defence is not the self-interest preservation of institutional powers but the protection of democracy itself. In order to be able to protect democracy, courts must be able to protect themselves.
- Location
-
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Frankfurt am Main
- Extent
-
Online-Ressource
- Language
-
Englisch
- Bibliographic citation
-
The Democratic Self-Defence of Constitutional Courts ; volume:18 ; number:1 ; year:2024 ; pages:1-24 ; extent:24
Vienna online journal on international constitutional law ; 18, Heft 1 (2024), 1-24 (gesamt 24)
- Creator
-
Castillo-Ortiz, Pablo
Roznai, Yaniv
- DOI
-
10.1515/icl-2024-0001
- URN
-
urn:nbn:de:101:1-2024031214460027863998
- Rights
-
Open Access; Der Zugriff auf das Objekt ist unbeschränkt möglich.
- Last update
-
14.08.2025, 11:03 AM CEST
Data provider
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.
Associated
- Castillo-Ortiz, Pablo
- Roznai, Yaniv